For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Aromatherapy proponents claim essential oils derived from plants can do everything from alter moods to cure bladder infections. It’s certainly big business. But are aromatherapy products harmful? Last July, the Donna Karan Beauty Co. discovered that its Nectar Watermist fragrance, intended to soothe stress and anxiety, contained Burkholderia cepacia. The pathogen colonizes in the lungs and can be fatal to people with respiratory diseases such as cystic fibrosis, according to Food and Drug Administration spokesman Arthur Whitmore.

DKBC responded quickly, reporting the problem to the FDA and recalling the product only weeks after it hit store shelves. But while the company was required to report the recall, there’s not much the FDA can do to prevent such problems, because it doesn’t regulate aromatherapies unless the manufacturer makes a medical claim.

Most aromatherapies are inhalation-based and work by stimulating the brain’s olfactory lobe, which affects the emotions. Few studies have been done to prove whether their claims have any scientific basis. “The cart is before the horse,” says the Smell and Taste Treatment and Research Foundation’s Dr. Alan Hirsch, who is currently conducting studies of aromatherapy products. Among his findings thus far: Lavender and pumpkin pie scents increase penile blood flow and may serve as a possible cure for impotence.

But Dr. William Jarvis of the National Council Against Health Fraud takes a harder line, calling aromatherapy “quackery by definition.” He says it’s like the myth that dancing around roses would prevent the black death. “Eventually, they all died anyway.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest