Dirty Lies

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

“Severe restrictions on the amount of energy we use”? Not even. What the polluters aren’t telling you is that America could easily cut its energy use right now without consumers even feeling a pinch, because so much energy is wasted by dirty and antiquated power plant technologies. At the White House Conference on Climate Change last month at Georgetown University, Tom Casten, the president and CEO of Trigen Energy Corporation, pointed out that an incredible two-thirds of the energy used in power plants in the United States is wasted, never converted to electricity, and that simply by using conservation technologies to recover lost heat, the U.S. could reduce its CO2 emissions by 22%. (Trigen specializes in turning “waste” energy into commercial power.) It’s the power companies who’d feel the pinch, because they’d be forced to clean up their act in order to compete.

What’s more, economists and energy scientists agree that energy conservation — and the development of cost-effective renewable energy sources like photovoltaic, wind, biomass, and ocean thermal — could actually end up saving the consumer money, because these options cost less than the polluting fuels they would replace.

For a good starting point on alternative energy and conservation projects, including those you can start right in your own household, try the Rocky Mountain Institute.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend