Close Encounters, of the Illegal Kind

As if astronauts didn’t already have enough to worry about, an obscure NASA regulation made it illegal for them to run and tell Mom they’d been “extraterrestrially exposed.”

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Little did Captain Kirk know that after he kissed a Klingon, he should have had those lips quarantined. OK, so it’s just a TV show, but skipping out on quarantine procedures after making contact with extraterrestrials was actually illegal until 1991 under an obscure NASA regulation.

The Extraterrestrial Exposure Law, enacted by NASA on July 16, 1969 (the date of the Apollo-11 launch), provided fines of up to $5,000 and prison time of up to one year for anyone who violated strict quarantine procedures after being “extraterrestrially exposed.”

In an effort to be perfectly clear, NASA provided the following definitions:

  • “Extraterrestrially exposed” means the state or condition of any person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever, who or which has:

    1. Touched directly or come within the atmospheric envelope of any other celestial body; or

    2. Touched directly or been in close proximity to any person, property, animal or other form of life or matter who or which has been extraterrestrially exposed [so hold back the urge…]
  • For example, if person or thing “A” touches the surface of the Moon, and on “A”‘s return to the Earth, “B” touches “A” and, subsequently, “C” touches “B,” all of these — “A” through “C” inclusive — would be extraterrestrially exposed… [Got it?]

  • “Quarantine” means the detention, examination and decontamination of any person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever that is extraterrestrially exposed, and includes the apprehension or seizure of such person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever.

NASA also stressed that the regulation applied to “NASA manned and unmanned space missions which land on or come within the atmospheric envelope of a celestial body and return to the Earth.” The rule does not apply to you and me. In other words, if the little green men land in your backyard, you have NASA’s permission to invite them in for tea.

UFO buffs note that the law has mysteriously vanished from the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, with only the cryptic legend “Reserved” to be found where 14 CFR Part 1211 used to be. What happened, says NASA public affairs specialist Elsie Weigel, is that NASA removed the regulation in April 1991 “because we never found any aliens.” Officially, the Extraterrestrial Exposure Law “has served its purpose and is no longer in keeping with our policy,” NASA says.

NASA has “reserved” Section 1211, perhaps so that similar regulations can be reinstated if the agency ever sends humans to another celestial body, or brings back samples via an unmanned probe. If the planned earthling mission to collect samples from Mars takes place on schedule in year 2009, Americans may once again be subject to the Extraterrestrial Exposure Law.

Until then, you have NASA’s consent to be abducted by aliens and return home quarantine-free.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend