MoJo 400 Central (1997)

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The 1997 Mother Jones 400

April 1997

Jane
Huang was the “homemaker” who ranked #262 on last year’s
Mother Jones
400.
Although few suspected that her husband John’s fundraising for the
Democratic
National Committee would become part of a national scandal,
the very size of her
combined $66,000-plus in contributions should have
given pause.

Similarly, this year’s list,
covering the 1995-96 election
cycle, provides clues to future
campaign scandals. With gifts to the
political parties virtually unregulated,
huge donations have become
outrageously common. The current rankings are based on
such “soft money”
gifts as well as contributions to federal candidates and
political
action committees. They do not include money spent on the renting of
lobbyists
or the fueling of sophisticated public relations campaigns
through so-called
independent expenditures.

True, the likes of Apple
founder Steve Jobs (#128) or
Barbra Streisand (#369)
appear to have contributed out of charity or vanity. But
big donors are
more often motivated by the need for a legislative or regulatory
fix.
Take David H. Koch (#10), an oil
magnate who spread around scads of cash to
block tougher EPA regulations
of a type of air pollution that may cause 40,000
premature deaths each
year. Or investment banker and fundamentalist Foster Friess (#14),
who
pursues favorable treatment of mutual funds when he’s not helping run
a
cabal that shapes GOP policy.

On the opposite curb of this shakedown
street
stand fundraisers like Terry McAuliffe. He likes to stress that he
worked for
President Clinton rather than the troubled DNC. But our
profile of him (see
Big Game Hunter“) reveals
otherwise and demonstrates the blurry moral
character of the status quo.

That both parties play the big-money game offers no
consolation to
voters. An unacceptable corrosion occurs when the influence of
donors so
clearly trumps that of average citizens. But reform is possible: The

proposals in “Reform School” would increase
both transparency and accountability. Crisis
breeds opportunity, and
rather than being enervated by the current scandals, we
should seize this
rare chance to shift power from the bigwigs to the electorate.

Profiles of Top Contributors |
The MoJo 400 list |
Search
the Itemized Contributions


Acknowledgments

Find out how to search the MoJo 400 from your own site!

Get
the latest news on campaign finance, and let us know what you think of
our current coverage: Join our mailing
list
.




MoJo 400
articles

Big Game Hunter

Meet Terry McAuliffe, the man who created Clinton’s
fundraising monster.



Sugar Daddie$

Cuban-born
sugar magnate José Fanjul can’t vote, but he — and his family —
sure can donate!



Oil
Slick


This donor’s oil business is fighting
EPA clean air regulations by
paying others to do its dirty work.



Especially
Interested


Meet two senators who voted on
legislation that affected special
interests — their own.




Reform School
What
we all need to know about campaign finance reform.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest