Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


In December, a South Carolina government agency dashed developers’ hopes for a 750-foot bridge from the mainland to Sandy Island, saying plans to log the island’s longleaf pine forests threatened the red-cockaded woodpecker. More grateful than the woodpeckers, however, are 130 members of the “Gullah” community, who have remained isolated on the coastal river delta island for more than a century.

Gullahs descend from West Africans brought to South Carolina to work as slaves on rice plantations. Several Gullah communities, speaking a dialect traced back to the region that is now Angola, still exist among the state’s islands. But the 4.5-by-7-mile Sandy Island is one of only two without bridges to the mainland.

Along with environmentalists, Sandy Island’s Gullah residents oppose a bridge because they fear developers (including textile magnate Roger Milliken) will cover the island with resorts. One prospective development plan outlined a proposal for a resort with equestrian trails, golf courses, a marina, and enough condominiums to house nearly 20,000.

One resident, Wilhelmena Pyatt, 41, remembers how the island lacked electricity, phones, and regular ferry service when she was a child. Like most Sandy Island adults, she rides a small boat every day to the mainland. There, she picks up her car at a parking lot and drives to work in nearby Myrtle Beach. Children take ferries to coastal schools. “You know everyone on the island. Even children who have ended up leaving find time to come back to visit.” A bridge, she says, would change everything.

Pyatt says community members expect a bridge will be built some day, but they hope it can be used to promote nature-based tourism. “That will allow us to continue our natural way of living.” Besides, Pyatt points out, a bridge would mean a shorter commute: “I could drive my car to my house,” she says.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest