A Real American Workplace

After studying corporate downsizing, a government staff sees it up close.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

When describing his pet project, the Office of the American Workplace, Labor Secretary Robert Reich promised in 1993 that it would guide a worried public through the job market’s turbulent seas. “The workplace is a win-win or a lose-lose situation,” he said. “We all win or we all lose together.”

Let’s hope he’s wrong. It turns out not even the folks at the Office of the American Workplace are safe. All 50 OAW staffers–who studied workplace conditions, strike prevention, and worker-friendly options to corporate downsizing–are likely to join the cruel job market they know all too well.

The GOP tanked the OAW’s $7 million budget after President Clinton made the agency responsible for monitoring federal contracts and canceling those with companies that use scabs. Apparently, Clinton gave OAW the new responsibility as a boon to unions after he failed to pass an anti-strike replacement bill.

OAW staff members, meanwhile, await word on their future. “The Labor Department and the union haven’t worked out what will happen,” says one ex-staffer.

Who should these latest victims of downsizing go to for advice? No one’s quite sure. In the past, they could always turn to the Office of the American Workplace.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend