Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

So said Pete Wilson this summer as he announced his presidential candidacy in front of the Statue of Liberty. But an examination of the accomplishments trumpeted in his campaign literature shows Wilson’s policies have been inconsistent, self-serving, and in some cases, downright illegal:

Pete Wilson was the first governor in the nation to start dismantling affirmative action programs.

Tough words from a longtime architect of civic and statewide affirmative action programs. As mayor of San Diego in 1972, Wilson helped pass an initiative aimed at increasing the number of minorities employed by the city. “We are interested in employing black and brown talent,” he told the San Diego Union.

Since 1991, Gov. Wilson has signed at least 24 bills containing affirmative action provisions. And as recently as October 1994, Wilson stated he has “long supported [minority] set-asides.”

Pete Wilson was also the first governor to sign into law a “Three Strikes, You’re Out” bill to lock up career criminals.

This ostensibly tough anti-crime measure has clogged the courts and saddled California with an extraordinary financial burden. Since Wilson took office, state-prison spending has increased by 48 percent, including a 9 percent increase for fiscal 1995-96. The RAND corporation estimates the law’s price tag for California taxpayers will eventually reach $5.5 billion per year. Meanwhile, overflowing prisons have forced the premature release of countless inmates: In Los Angeles, the county jail lets 4,200 inmates out early each month, partly to accommodate petty thieves, facing life in prison, who now demand jury trials.

Pete Wilson…has also held the line on out-of-control state spending, reducing the state’s general fund budget by $1.6 billion from his first year in office.

Wilson’s opponents love to remind him that in 1991 he authorized a $7.5 billion tax hike, the biggest state tax increase in U.S. history. His attempts to deflate the ballooning budget deficit since then may end up costing the state even more. Wilson and the state legislature “closed” the state’s budget gap through a series of disingenuous deals, such as raiding property taxes from local governments, deferring government employee benefits, classifying education spending as a “loan” to public schools, and dipping into cigarette tax revenue earmarked for anti-smoking education. Five such devices have been declared illegal, which could force the state to repay as much as $3 billion, not to mention hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

A national leader for immigration reform, Gov. Wilson led the charge to enact Proposition 187, an initiative to end taxpayer-supported services for those who enter the country illegally.

Wilson has a habit of luring immigrants to California, then turning his back on them once they arrive. In the mid-’80s, Wilson supported a supplement to the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act that offered legal residency to immigrants who could prove, after arriving in the country, that they were agricultural workers. As recently as 1993, Wilson rejected a series of reforms, including a Proposition 187-like proposal to deny taxpayer funds to illegal immigrants.

Last year, he jumped on the anti-immigrant band-wagon with Proposition 187. Yet the proposition does nothing to prevent workers from entering the country illegally (Pete’s agribusiness backers are dependent on the labor of illegals), it just punishes them once they’re here. In late July, a federal judge strongly hinted she may soon summarily declare the law uncostitutional.

Pete Wilson hasn’t just talked about ending welfare as we know it. In California, he has dramatically reduced welfare grants by putting people back on the road to self-reliance.

Wilson has slashed Aid to Families with Dependent Children by 25 percent over the last four years. As a result, the number of California children living in poverty has grown by 400,000 since 1991.

In this year’s budget, he cut funds for the poor, elederly, blind, and disabled in the state’s 41 poorest counties by 10 percent. Even his much-advertised workfare program, GAIN, lost $40 million of its original designated funding. Meanwhile, Wilson pushed an across-the-board 15 percent corporate and income tax cut, only to have it killed by the state Senate.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend