Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The next time you retrieve that suit from the dry cleaner’s, consider that you may be picking up more than you dropped off. Clinging to most freshly dry-cleaned clothing are traces of perchloroethylene, a chlorine- based compound used by 90 percent of all dry cleaners. Listed by the EPA as a hazardous air pollutant and a “probable human carcinogen,” perc has also been linked to neurological damage and reproductive disorders.

The largest consumers of perc, dry cleaners use an estimated 250 million pounds of the compound annually. While exposure to contaminated garments poses minimal health risks, a more serious threat from perc exists in our air, food, and water. Both the production and incineration fo this organochlorine create hundreds of toxic byproducts, and flushing perc into the sewer system contaminates groundwater supplies. Environmentalists are clamoring for a phase-out of this dirty cleaning solvent.

The enviros offer an alternative to perc, dubbed “GreenClean,” based on water, natural soaps, head, steam, and skilled labor. In addition to eco-dry cleaning’s obvious benefit–it doesn’t pump toxins into the environment–GreenClean offers a number of advantages, according to Greenpeace analysts:

Better Results:
EPA data and consumer surveys show GreenClean equals or outperforms perc.
More Jobs:
Because GreenClean relies on individual treatment of garments, it requires a 21 percent increase in labor–a cost offset by reductions in other operating expenses, such as chemical costs and hazardous waste disposal fees.
Increased Profit:
EPA numbers show that GreenClean operations require a 41 percent lower investment than traditional setups and yield a 5 percent higher profit.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend