Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Frustrated by a coin-operated Congress that has little interest in–or reason to–reform, citizens are taking matters into their own hands by placing initiatives on state ballots that effectively bypass their lawmakers:

  • In a closely watched case, more than 725,000 Californians signed a petition to qualify a single-payer health care initiative for the November ballot. Ignoring the mangled Clinton plan and defyyng the insurance industry’s relentless lobbying against any kind of health reform, voters will decide if the state should set up a Canadian-style system. In view of lobbyists’ power over lawmakers, “the only avenue open is to take single payer direcdly to the voter,” says Glen Schneider, chair of Californians for Health Security, the group organizing the single-payer drive. “With the legislature, it’s only 120 votes [special interests] need to control,” he notes. “But controlling 8 million votes [expected to be cast in November] is a lot harder.”
  • Reformers are also using ballot measures to get big money out of politics. Petitions in Colorado, Missouri, Montana, and Oregon press for sharp limits on campaign contributions from individuals, interest groups, and PACs. In 1992, Washington, D.C., voters decided overwhelmingly to enact a $100 limit on campaign contributions. This year’s candidates for mayor, city council, and other seats are bound by these rules.
  • Advocates of term limits point to Rep. Dan Rostenkowski, D-Ill.: the 18-term congressman, indicted on 17 counts of public corruption, epitomizes the arrogance that career politiccans can develop. Voters in five states will consider congressional term limits this fall. Some courts, however, have ruled that term limits are unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court will review the issue during its next session.

Why are these bottom-up reform efforts proliferating? “People are angry about government’s inability to work for real people,” says Donna Edwards of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for a New Democracy. “That anger is being transmitte d to the state level in part because of frustrations with the way Congress has chosen not to deal with reform.” She predicts that citizen-sponsored reforms will create models for change, “so that inevitably Congress won’t have a choice. They’ll be bullied into reform.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend