Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Our 1991 story on Russian ultranationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky (“The Coup: Next Time,” Nov./Dec.) profiled the ambitious and dangerous man whose party had such unexpected success in last December’s elections. The question is, could he become Russia’s next president? Three scenarios could make this possible: 1) mounting tensions between Russia and Ukraine over Crimea, a predominantly Russian region that was shuffled over to Ukraine during the Soviet period. Communists on both sides are backing their respective nationalists. A disruptive conflict would give Zhirinovsky’s extremist alliance, which includes hard-line Communists, a fresh raison d’etre; 2) conflict in the former Yugoslavia could result in increased Western pressure on Serbia, a traditional Russian ally, giving Russia’s conservatives an excuse to demand intervention. Revival of Cold War antagonisms would disrupt Russia’s relations with the international community and sabotage the country’s reform process; 3) Boris Yeltsin’s untimely death–or debilitating illness–could create a power vacuum before his term expires in 1996. Or if Yeltsin’s popularity plummets and he exits before reformers can unite behind a single candidate, Zhirinovsky and his coalition could easily take advantage of the reformers’ disarray.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend