MotherJones ND93:Bad, bad, No-rap Brown

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

While heading police departments in Atlanta, Houston, and New York, Lee Brown was so smooth they called him “No-rap Brown.” Now he’s America’s drug czar, directing the Office for National Drug Policy Control. We tried to pin him down:

Q: How are you different from your predecessor, William Bennett?

A: We’ll place more emphasis on reducing demand for drugs by focusing on our youths, our inner cities.

Q: When do you start education, prevention, and treatment?

A: In preschool. [Parents], schools, religious institutions, the media all have a stake in this. It’s not a black-white issue or a Democrat- Republican issue; it’s an American issue.

Q: Some critics believe that introducing drug-education programs to kids at too early an age only encourages them to experiment.

A: You can’t fool kids; you have to be honest. They have to see the danger. Your program has to vary depending on their age.

Q: The civil rights movement believes in mandatory minimum sentencing for drug crimes. Do you see any value in reform?

A: Disparity does exist. For five grams of crack cocaine, you get mandatory minimum time in prison. For the same amount of powder cocaine, you get probation. The result is that African-Americans are the ones using crack, and they are going to prison for possessing small amounts, while whites are not for possessing the same small amount of powder cocaine. We’ve made minimum mandatory punishment more severe, but not more certain. We have to try to reverse that.

Q: What about legalization of drugs?

A: I’m diametrically opposed–it would be the moral equivalent to genocide. We can’t let that happen.

Q: So what do you propose?

A: One policy that would do the most in the long run is to give people jobs. I [also] want to see legislation to end the proliferation of guns on the streets of our cities. Drug addiction is more than just a criminal-justice problem; it’s a public-health issue as well. There’s no silver bullet. Saying you’re going to solve the problem with one idea is folly.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend