Kim Petras’ New Track Revitalizes a Longstanding Controversy

“All I Do Is Cry” is only the latest in a string of collaborations with an alleged abuser.

Daniel Knighton/Getty

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Kim Petras has a reputation for consistently releasing solid songs. From her breakout 2017 debut “I Don’t Want It At All,” to her most recent, “All I Do Is Cry,” her pace has been impressive. She even packed in a Halloween-themed album, Turn off the Light Vol. 1. All signs point to bonafide pop star stardom.

But her success has also drawn more attention to the work of her collaborator, behind-the-scenes hitmaker, Lukasz Gottwald, who’s also known as Dr. Luke. Gottwald, gained his fame for producing and writing hits like “California Girls” by Katy Perry, and Kelly Clarkson’s “Since U Been Gone.” But recently, he has become better known for allegations of rape and emotional abuse made by Kesha. Gottwald has denied all allegations, calling it a smear campaign.  Over the last few years, from Kesha to Kelly Clarkson, P!nk to Lady Gaga, women across the music industry have alleged having had bad experiences with the producer.

He’s also behind many, if not all of Petras’s songs, hits or not, whether as a producer or a songwriter. And this new song revitalizes a longstanding controversy, and something I find very interesting: how a popular artist doing a ton for representation runs up against legitimate criticism. 

Petras isn’t oblivious to the allegations. “I would like my fans to know that I wouldn’t work with somebody I believe to be an abuser of women, definitely not,” she said in an interview with NME. The backlash from this statement was instant, with fans of Kesha—and many others—saying she was being insensitive and apologizing for Gottwald. After the announcement appeared that she would open on Troye Sivan’s tour, the artist received more pushback from his fans and apologized for her previous remarks. Part of this may have to do with Petras’s aversion to politics and conversations about her trans identity. She’s always said that she wants people to focus on her music.

While she’s secured some mainstream success, she’s also secured something maybe even more valuable: Cult-like status among a legion of queer fans for whom pop music holds a special, cherished place. Joining the ranks of acts like Charli XCX, Carly Rae Jepsen, and Slayyyter, Petras has carved out a specific sound for herself and found a community who revels in the blissful pop.

As her new song makes the rounds, there’s no doubt the controversy will continue among critics and fans alike. 

Gay men in particular appear to be ignoring, or at least rationalizing, her ongoing collaborations with Dr. Luke. Interviews and articles with her tend to avoid the topic altogether, as well as tweet after tweet that continue to justify the never ending collaboration.

Many gay men are not exactly models in terms of treating women with respect. We sometimes appropriate black women’s culture, or assume that being gay gives us a pass for sexual harassment, and love using that C slur (Or as RuPaul coined, “Charisma, Uniqueness, Nerve, and Talent!”).

The way in which Petras’s collaborations with Dr. Luke are rationalized by gay men, and many of her fans, is only a small piece of a much larger, misogynistic music industry. Petras isn’t the only one still working with Dr. Luke, or by any means the only pop artist with a history of being involved with problematic figures. But her story can be seen as a microcosm of how gay men, and music fans at large, often go out of their way to ignore or justify the abuse of women—alleged or otherwise—for the sake of a good song.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend