Is This Twitter Account the Real Reason Bill O’Reilly Went on Vacation?

Meet the activists keeping accusations of sexual harassment by the Fox News host front and center.

Stan Godlewski/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Mired deep in a sexual harassment scandal and advertiser boycott, Bill O’Reilly, host of Fox News’ cash cow The O’Reilly Factor, announced on Tuesday night that he is going on vacation. While a Fox News spokesperson said O’Reilly will return on April 24, the Daily Intelligencer reports that several Fox News staffers doubt that he’ll be back.

O’Reilly’s announcement comes only 11 days after a New York Times investigation revealed that O’Reilly and Fox News have collectively paid $13 million to settle a series of sexual harassment disputes against the host, in which women complained of “verbal abuse, lewd comments, unwanted advances and phone calls in which it sounded as if Mr. O’Reilly was masturbating, according to documents and interviews.” As of this writing, 82 advertisers have publicly withdrawn from his show, representing an estimated $37-$42 million loss, says Angelo Carusone, president of the progressive nonprofit Media Matters.

Bill O’Reilly’s trouble with advertisers is in part due to a campaign jointly run by Carusone, Think Progress‘ Editor-in-Chief Judd Legum, and the anonymous Twitter account Sleeping Giants, which gained a huge following shortly after Trump’s election by launching a campaign to dissuade companies from advertising on Breitbart News

“We had so much success at that point getting advertisers to come down from Breitbart that when the Bill O’Reilly article came out, there was definitely a huge amount of support,” says a spokesperson from Sleeping Giants. “This is an anti-bigotry campaign. There are advertisers involved. So it made a lot of sense to us as far as the mission was concerned.”

Legum and Carusone, who had orchestrated a similar campaign to oust Glenn Beck from Fox News in 2009, quickly reached out to help. “We’ve got Judd and Angelo reaching out personally [to advertisers], and we’ve been hitting them on Twitter, which is a much more public forum,” says the Sleeping Giants spokesperson. “We’re kind of letting them know from every angle.”

Carusone appeared on MSNBC on Monday to give an update on the O’Reilly boycott, where he said his estimates suggest the campaign has driven away enough advertisers to cripple the show, even if the host returns to his post. “His program will never recover,” Carusone said.

Because O’Reilly is a television show hosting a relatively small number of advertisers, in some ways it is an easier target than Sleep Giants’ first mission, a website that is served by a warren of online advertising networks and brokers. “There’s not an endless wellspring of advertisers [on O’Reilly’s show] like there is on Breitbart,” says the Sleeping Giants’ spokesperson. “We don’t have to reach out to a hundred advertisers a day. There’s only so many of them.”

As the Daily Intelligencer reported, two highly placed Fox News sources say James Murdoch, CEO of Fox News’ parent company, 21st Century Fox, wants to boot O’Reilly out, whereas his father, Rupert, and his older brother, Lachlan, are more inclined to let him stay.

Sleeping Giants’ spokesperson says they’ll keep up their campaign until Fox issues a statement, apology, or takes other constructive action: “We’re supposed to be here. We’re going to be around.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend