Charleston Paper Investigating Church Shooting May Have Been Attacked by Hackers

The Post and Courier’s website was taken down Friday morning after a possible web attack.

A screenshot of the Post and Courier's website on Friday.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Charleston’s Pulitzer Prize-winning daily newspaper, the Post and Courier, is investigating the possibility of a “denial of service” attack that shut down its news website for long stretches Friday morning, in the wake of Wednesday night’s massacre at the city’s Emanuel AME church.

“We’re exploring whether it was an infrastructure issue, or whether it was a concerted attack, a DDoS attack,” Mitch Pugh, the newspaper’s executive editor, told Mother Jones Friday morning. Pugh is referring to a “distributed denial-of-service” attack, which renders a website useless by overwhelming its servers with automated requests for information. “It’s starting to look like someone tried to take our site down,” he said, though he warned it’s still too early to say for sure, despite “early indications.”

The Post and Courier first posted about the outage at about 7 a.m. Friday morning, via Twitter. But problems persisted. The website was inaccessible for “20 to 30 minutes at a time, sporadically,” across the morning, Pugh said. The companies responsible for hosting the website, he noted, are “telling us that they are seeing activity on their end that would indicate a DDoS attack.”

The site’s outage comes amid the newspaper’s second major international story in as many months, after the death of Walter Scott in North Charleston in April. The outlet has been aggressively covering the Charleston church massacre since Wednesday night, producing up-to-the-minute coverage on its website by throwing between a half and a third of its newsroom (of about 80 people) at the story, Pugh says. Covering such an intense story has been emotionally and physically draining for everyone: “We’re trying to get people more into a shift mode and get some mental health breaks, and some downtime to get some rest,” he said.

“A lot of our folks know people who were either in the church or close to people in the church,” he added. “So it’s certainly an emotional, difficult time for everybody.”

Pugh said the newspaper was working with its hosting companies—NewsCycle Solutions and Savvis—to get to the bottom of why the website went offline. In the meantime, the website appears to be back in business:


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend