The Bay After: A Chat With Barry Levinson

The acclaimed director on his new ecohorror mock-doc—and what frightens him in real life.

A still from "The Bay"Roadside Attractions

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In Barry Levinson’s latest—think Blair Witch meets Jaws meets The Day After Tomorrow—the Chesapeake Bay is a soup of steroid-laced chicken shit, pesticide runoff, and radioactive waste that turns a parasitic isopod species into flesh-eating mini-monsters. Levinson (Diner; Rain Man; Good Morning, Vietnam) filmed The Bay—which hit theaters earlier this month—mock-doc style, using a hodgepodge of gritty real-time video formats. I asked the acclaimed director about science versus fiction and why he went for a low-budget ecothriller. 

Mother Jones: How did this movie come about?

Barry Levinson: I was approached to do a documentary about the Chesapeake Bay. I started doing research and found there was already a great Frontline doc, but nobody cares­—people say, “It’s polluted, so what?” I said no. But a few months later, I thought, “We’ve gathered all this research; why don’t we tweak it for a theatrical release? We can scare an audience with a story that is 80 to 85 percent science and facts.”

MJ: Were you inspired by Jaws or Aliens?

“This is one of the few movies that uses a lot of science to frighten and unnerve.”

BL: No. The creatures in this film do exist. They go from small parasites on fish gills into isopods that eat fish from the inside. But if you’re playing around with the toxic soup, who knows what will happen?

MJ: Was it hard, weaving together all this unconventional footage?

BL: We made this film for $2 million, shot it in 18 days with a small crew using a lot of first-time actors, and used 21 different types of video cameras, including iPhones and cheap underwater video gear, to make it seem credible. This made for more-complicated editing. Everything had to be plotted out and done in one shot.

MJ: It’s notable that you don’t have a Hollywood hero arriving to save the day.

BL: There are good guys who try hard—the doctor in the local hospital, the CDC officials. They just don’t come up with the answers in time. We always want to believe we can take care of a problem, but there are some things we can’t take care of—look at the Gulf spill.

MJ: The Bay isn’t easy to watch. It’s very creepy.

BL: It can be upsetting, but in Outbreak and Contagion, people die. Those are not happy-go-lucky films. It’s part of this genre that exists. And the investment is minimal, so you get to play with these things. We can entertain and at the same time provide a cautionary tale.

MJ: After all your big studio films, making a low-budget ecological horror film is a pretty different approach.

BL: Doing something different keeps you fresh. And this is one of the few movies that uses a lot of science to frighten and unnerve. The Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the country. It’s at a tipping point—it’s up to 40 percent dead, and we just go about our business and say no big deal? That’s frightening to me.

Watch the trailer below:


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend