Revel With a Cause: Liberal Satire in Postwar America

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Revel With a Cause—a scholarly, in-depth look at two decades of postwar protest humor—left me wondering whether protest humor does anything more than provide catharsis. Does it actually change anything? Or as one plucky skeptic expressed back in 1964, could satire “not merely be futile but positively evil, in that it provides…a safety valve for righteous indignation”? When I’m doing political stand-up, I suspect I’m validating the sensibilities of the choir. At best, when I’m performing politically charged material for a truly diverse crowd—socially, economically, politically—it lets people who disagree with me experience how my comedic point of view is shared by people sitting right next to them who are laughing, and to the extent that laughter itself can be so contagious, sometimes people will open up just a crack. Is that a safety valve? In the sense that it keeps people sane, yes.

This book captures all these comedic voices—Jules Feiffer, Mad magazine, Second City, Mort Sahl, Tom Lehrer, Nichols and May, Stanley Kubric—rallying in a spontaneous rebellion against Cold War orthodoxy, McCarthyism, sexual repression, segregation, and the specter of “the bomb.” What animates Revel most is the emergence of Sahl and Lenny Bruce. After Sahl’s Broadway debut in 1958, a critic noted it as the dawn of a long overdue return to dissent, “an indication that something in our society has begun—after too many muddy and fearful years—to change. First thing you know, irreverence will be in vogue again and even satire may wear its old, outrageous and becoming smile.” By the time Bruce joined the pantheon to take all the other so-called satirists to school, the United States had become the world’s “prime incubator of nonconformist nightclub wit.” But Bruce was ruined by his indecency trials and Sahl’s obsession with the Kennedy assassination dated him, leaving a satirical void until George Carlin—outside the period of this book—picked up where Bruce left off.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend