Offshore

<i>Offshore: The Dark Side of the Global Economy</i>, By William Brittain-Catlin. <i>Farrar, Straus and Giroux. $25.</i>

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Question: What do Apple Computer, Enron, and Al Qaeda have in common? Answer: They’ve all mastered the art of using offshore money havens to raise funds on the sly, shield their assets, and free themselves from the web of international financial oversight. As former investigator William Brittain-Catlin puts it in this eye-opening book, “In our offshore world, secrecy has become the new freedom,” enabling companies to exist almost as accounting fictions, unbound by the demands of the state.

Offshore centers on the Cayman Islands, long known for its “no questions asked” policies. Here’s how a typical Cayman tax dodge, once used by Apple, worked: An Apple subsidiary in Singapore would build a Mac and “sell” it for $200 to an Apple front company in the Caymans, which then resold it to an American Apple dealer for $1,000. All told, Apple would make $800 in profit, but most of that would go to the front company, which paid no U.S. taxes. (The IRS caught on to this scheme, and in 1994 Apple forked over $114 million—not even half of what it owed.) Enron used a far more intricate array of tricks to hide its misdeeds from the prying eyes of regulators and analysts. With the help of nearly 700 holdings in the Caymans, between 1996 and 2000 it paid only $17 million in taxes on profits of $2 billion.

Nevertheless, even the Enrons can’t move offshore entirely: They still need the feds to provide corporate welfare and bail them out when they’re broke, even as their financial evasions deplete the tax base. Meanwhile, companies that play by the rules are unable to keep up with their tax-evading competitors, creating added incentive to funnel profits into foreign tax havens. After 9/11, the Bush administration realized that Al Qaeda could play the offshore game as well as anyone, and promised to clean up “the dark side” of international finance. But it’s done little to rein in those companies that don’t mind their offshore profits going back to Washington, so long as they end up in the right pockets.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest