Deep Water

<i>Deep Water: The Epic Struggle Over Dams, Displaced People, and the Environment</i>. By Jacques Leslie. <i>Farrar, Strauss & Giroux. $25.</i>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

For the past 70 years, the world has been on a dam-building spree, putting up 45,000 large dams at a cost of $2 trillion. Despite the awe they’ve inspired, the electricity generated, the deserts irrigated, most dams have come with huge environmental and human costs. In Deep Water, Jacques Leslie takes a thoughtful look at the ambivalent legacy of the rush to plug the world’s rivers and asks whether there can be such a thing as a “good dam.”

Leslie surveys dam projects from Australia to Zambia in a piece of meticulously researched globe-trotting. In his most compelling episode, he profiles Medha Patkar, an activist fighting India’s plan to build 30 large dams along the Narmada River. When Leslie meets her, Patkar has just tried unsuccessfully—again—to drown herself in the rising res-ervoir waters. Though such tactics illustrate how maddeningly futile it can be to stop a dam’s construction once it’s under way, Leslie credits anti-dam activists with slowing the pace of dam building. Even the World Bank, which has rarely met a dam it didn’t like, is starting to realize that not all dams are cost-effective or necessary.

Leslie’s no fan of big dams—he calls them “loaded weapons aimed down rivers”—but he’s not advocating monkeywrenching Glen Canyon. He believes that dams’ ultimate undoing will be the very hubris they’re built on. Dams aren’t forever: They silt up and outlive their intended purposes. One day, he predicts, these giant concrete slabs may be seen as “relics of the twentieth century, like Stalinism and gasoline-powered cars…reminders of an ancient time when humans believed they could vanquish nature.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend