American Dream

A <i>New York Times</i> reporter chronicles the post-Clinton welfare landscape.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Nothing marked Bill Clinton as a new kind of Democrat more than his campaign
pledge to “end welfare as we know it.” Both blunt and
vague, the promise resonated with a view that the social safety net had become a web that ensnared
the underclass, particularly African Americans, in a gloomy pathology of dependency. Too many
of the poor, Clinton said, couldn’t even dream the American Dream.

American Dream is the melancholy title Jason DeParle of the New York Times
chose for his richly researched, beautifully written chronicle of the era that fulfilled Clinton’s
pledge. Political abstractions are juxtaposed against the personal dramas of three emblematic
unwed mothers. By the book’s end, the women have 10 children between them, and one, at age 35,
is already a grandmother. At first glance, Angie, Jewell, and Opal seem to justify all the criticisms
of the welfare system: Each new birth ensures a larger welfare check; they move from Chicago to Milwaukee
for higher benefits and cheaper rent; they take jobs without telling the welfare office. Fathers
tend to be out of the picture—two are in prison for murder.

But DeParle’s intimate reporting reveals that welfare dependence
was a symptom, not a cause, of the chaotic happenstance of their lives. On a wrenching day when Angie,
in the stirrups preparing to end an unwanted pregnancy, abruptly halts the procedure, it is clear
that the prospect of a larger check is the last thing on her mind. These women are survi- vors, scuffling
by. When Washington moves to reform welfare, they shrug it off: They’ll manage. Two do so,
marginally improving their lots. The third, with no net to catch her, finds a bleaker fate.

Welfare reform is recalled as a triumph for Clinton, whose policy benefited
from a robust economy. DeParle’s judgment: The root cause of troubles in the African American
underclass was never welfare. But nobody has figured out how to legislate fatherhood.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend