Zuckerberg: Facebook Will Build a Brand New Privacy-Obsessed Social Network

Jaap Arriens

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Mark Zuckerberg says that Facebook is about to undergo some big changes. But as you read this, keep track of where the pea is:

Over the last 15 years, Facebook and Instagram have helped people connect with friends, communities, and interests in the digital equivalent of a town square. But people increasingly also want to connect privately in the digital equivalent of the living room….Today we already see that private messaging, ephemeral stories, and small groups are by far the fastest growing areas of online communication.

….Public social networks will continue to be very important in people’s lives — for connecting with everyone you know, discovering new people, ideas and content, and giving people a voice more broadly. People find these valuable every day, and there are still a lot of useful services to build on top of them. But now, with all the ways people also want to interact privately, there’s also an opportunity to build a simpler platform that’s focused on privacy first.

I understand that many people don’t think Facebook can or would even want to build this kind of privacy-focused platform — because frankly we don’t currently have a strong reputation for building privacy protective services, and we’ve historically focused on tools for more open sharing. But we’ve repeatedly shown that we can evolve to build the services that people really want, including in private messaging and stories.

Media reports are calling this a “radical shift,” but I’m not so sure. Zuckerberg says clearly that Facebook itself isn’t going away and isn’t going to change. He is simply going to build a new platform to go alongside it.

How good will this new platform be? As Zuckerberg says, in the understatement of the year, he doesn’t have a great reputation for ensuring privacy. But maybe he can change. Maybe the new platform will be really great. However, keep this in mind: in order to grow his new platform, he will almost certainly want to link it to current Facebook and Instagram users. After all, would you ignore a captive audience of billions if you were building a new social network? Probably not. Especially if you were the kind of person who says with a straight face about Facebook’s current platform, “We’ve worked hard to build privacy into all our products, including those for public sharing.” Ha ha. That’s a good one, Mark.

If this new platform is connected in even the tiniest way to Facebook, it’s unlikely that it will be truly private. Keep your eyes wide open as this new platform progresses.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend