Obamacare Continues Not to Fail in 2018

So how is Obamacare doing? We already know that it ended the 2018 enrollment period with only slightly fewer signups than 2017. That’s not bad considering the relentless campaign of sabotage that Donald Trump engaged in.

But how about insurers? They didn’t abandon the Obamacare exchanges in nearly the numbers some people were afraid of. The Kaiser Family Foundation gives us an idea why:

When Obamacare started up, insurers on average charged premiums that were only about $600 per year more than medical claims. That’s not enough for them to stay profitable in a broad market where they’re required to cover anyone who applies.¹ Last year, however, they charged about $1,200 more, and this year they’re charging $1,800 more. That’s plenty to stay in the black:

The medical loss ratio is the percentage of premium dollars paid out in claims. For ordinary employer health insurance it’s around 90 percent. The individual market has more overhead, so maintaining profitability requires a lower MLR—somewhere in the range of 80-85 percent, which is what Obamacare mandates.

In its first three years, the MLR for Obamacare insurers was barely in that range, which meant insurers were on rocky ground. Last year, after big premium increases, the MLR dropped to 75 percent, and this year it’s down to 68 percent. That’s plenty to maintain profitability. It’s so good, in fact, that most insurers will be required to rebate some of their premiums in order to maintain the 80-85 percent level required by Obamacare.

In other words, the sabotage isn’t working. Consumers continue to enroll and insurers have enough experience under their belts to do their underwriting more accurately. This means that Obamacare really shouldn’t see big premium increases in most states this year. We’ll see.

¹Though it’s enough in a market where you insure only healthy people and turn down anyone with a pre-existing condition.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest