The Internet Might Be Keeping Inflation Low

Austan Goolsbee and Peter Klenow have taken a crack at estimating e-inflation: the inflation rate of items bought online compared to those bought offline. They make use of the Adobe Analytics dataset to calculate a Digital Price Index (DPI) and then compare it to a matched set of items from the normal CPI basket of goods. Here’s the result, with ordinary CPI-U overlaid on their chart:

As you can see, they calculate that DPI is quite a bit lower than the matched CPI: about four points lower over the course of nearly four years. However, the fact that the basket of goods happens to be one that’s been deflating over the past four years makes me wonder if it’s really representative of overall inflation. If it is, then overall e-inflation has been about four points lower than CPI-U. If not, then who knows?

This is above my pay grade, but here are a couple of interesting charts from their paper. First of all, there’s one category where buying online apparently doesn’t help. Can you guess what it is?

Good ol’ health care. Apparently prices rise faster online than offline for medical supplies. Yeesh. But in the news-you-can-use category, check out recreational goods:

Every year, like clockwork, there’s a sudden drop in November. So if you’re looking for a good deal on sleeping bags or canoes, buy online in November. You’re welcome.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend