Bitcoin Is a Lousy Form of Money

Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Is bitcoin a good replacement for money? This is a popular question these days, but it’s poorly framed. “Money” should be thought of more as an adjective than a noun. That is, certain things are more moneylike than others. A dollar bill, for example, is more moneylike than a Krugerrand, which in turn is more moneylike than a corporate bond.

So what are the attributes that make something useful as money? Here’s a non-exhaustive list:

  1. Not intrinsically useful¹
  2. Easily transportable
  3. Rare and not easy to counterfeit
  4. Widely accepted
  5. Liquid even during panics
  6. Can pay taxes with it
  7. Stable store of value

Bitcoin does well on the first three. However, it does poorly on the next four. It is not widely accepted. It has high transaction costs and hasn’t been tested during a financial crisis. No government accepts it for payment of taxes. And as its recent bubble-esque behavior demonstrates, it’s not especially stable:

Pay particular attention to #6 on the list of moneylike attributes. It’s often said that although the dollar is no longer backed by gold, it’s still a solid currency because it’s backed by the productive capacity of the United States and the integrity of the US government. And that’s true. Ultimately, though, it’s backed by the willingness of the US government to take dollars as payment of taxes. No matter how skeptical you may be of fiat money, you’ll still accept it if you know that, at the very least, you can pay your taxes with it. And if that’s true of you, it’s true of everyone else.

Unfortunately for Bitcoin, the first three items on this list are the least important. Old Masters fit the bill, for example. Ditto for meteorite fragments and dinosaur fossils. It’s the last four items that are really key attributes of money, and Bitcoin isn’t anywhere close to satisfying any of them.

For now, Bitcoin is just a commodity, like tulips or Tokyo real estate, and not even a very good one. At least tulips are pretty to look at. So if you feel like taking a flyer on it, go right ahead as long as you’re using money you can afford to lose. Just don’t do it because you think it’s going to replace dollars or euros anytime soon.

¹Chocolate, for example, would be a poor form of money because we would just eat it all. Ditto for salt, which has been a form of money in some civilizations—though not a very good one. The best money is something that has no particular value other than being money.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest