And Now For Corporate Taxes

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

OK, it’s time to run down the “unified framework” proposals for corporate taxes. I’m going to try to choose my bullet points carefully. Here are the framework’s concrete proposals:

  1. The tax rate for partnerships and S corporations is reduced to 25 percent. The tax rate for C corporations (which includes most big companies) is reduced from 35 percent to 20 percent.
  2. Capital investments can be written off immediately, rather than being depreciated over a period of years.
  3. C corporations will no longer be allowed to write off 100 percent of their interest expenses.
  4. Foreign earnings can be repatriated at a 0 percent rate.
  5. Going forward, foreign earnings of multinational corporations will be taxed “at a reduced rate and a global basis.”

That’s the good news for corporations, and it’s presented with at least a little bit of detail. But then there are all the additional measures necessary to (partly) pay for this largesse. Here they are:

  1. In order to prevent millionaires from gaming the new lower rates, the framework “contemplates” that Congress will figure out measures to “prevent the recharacterization of personal income into business income to prevent wealthy individuals from avoiding the top personal tax rate.”
  2. Immediate expensing of capital investments is good, but maybe we need even more? Congress is expected to “continue to work” on enhancing expensing rules for small businesses.
  3. Corporations can no longer deduct interest expenses, but what about everyone else? “The committees will consider the appropriate treatment of interest paid by non-corporate taxpayers.”
  4. The framework keeps the R&D tax credit and the low-income housing credit. However, “numerous other special exclusions and deductions” will be eliminated.
  5. But not every special deduction will get the ax. Congress may decide to retain “some other business credits.” Naturally, this will be done only within existing “budgetary limitations,” which are not spelled out.
  6. And what about all the special deals for favored industries that litter thte tax code? The framework says only that it will “modernize” these special deals to ensure the tax code “better reflects economic reality.”
  7. Foreign profits of multinationals will be taxed at a reduced rate, but what about everyone else? The framework says that Congress will write rules to “level the playing field between U.S.-headquartered parent companies and foreign-headquartered parent companies.”

This whole thing is a huge nothingburger. There are a handful of concrete proposals, all of which we’ve been talking about for months, and then a series of punts on every single other aspect of the plan. Basically, this brief document is little more than a tweetstorm to Congress laying out a few vague desires and telling them to work out the details. It reminds me of a high school student who hasn’t done the work and tries to hide it in a term paper that uses wide margins, lots of prefatory throat clearing, plenty of space between paragraphs, and frequent appeals to “disagreements between experts.” This is not progress.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend