What I’ve Been Reading This Year (Maybe)

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Atrios has been listing the books he’s read this year, and this got me curious about which books I’ve read this year. The answer is that I don’t know. Some time ago I began using Nook as my regular e-reader because the Kindle app is a piece of crap on Windows tablets. And it turns out that Barnes & Noble makes it all but impossible to figure out when you bought a book. You can check your orders for the past six months, but they provide only order numbers, not book titles. I looked and looked, but unless I missed something obvious there’s no real way to know when you bought a particular book.

That’s kind of annoying—at least, for those of us who are easily annoyed. Anyway, take this list with a grain of salt, but here’s what I’ve read in the first half of the year, in chronological order:

  1. Charlie Jane Anders, All the Birds in the Sky
  2. Ethan Canin, A Doubter’s Almanac
  3. Michael Eric Dyson, Tears We Cannot Stop
  4. Connie Willis, Crosstalk
  5. Alice Dreger, Galileo’s Middle Finger
  6. Brian Stavely, The Emperor’s Blades
  7. Brian Stavely, The Providence of Fire
  8. Brian Stavely, The Last Mortal Bond
  9. Rob Sheffield, Dreaming the Beatles
  10. Joan Williams, White Working Class
  11. Al Franken, Giant of the Senate
  12. Cory Doctorow, Walkaway
  13. Charles Stross, Empire Games
  14. David Weigel, The Show That Never Ends
  15. Paul Beatty, Sellout

Did I also read one or two dead-tree books? I think I did! But I don’t remember what they were.

It’s mostly fiction. Political nonfiction (broadly defined) has become so partisan that I find I don’t enjoy it much these days. There are several books I liked on this list, but none that blew me away. I guess my top picks are A Doubter’s Almanac among fiction¹ and Galileo’s Middle Finger among nonfiction.

¹Assuming you get a kick out of novels about disturbed, world-class mathematicians, which I do.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend