Here’s an Honest Argument In Favor of Trumpcare

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Avik Roy finally explains in plain language why he’s really so enthusiastic about the Senate version of Trumpcare:

Repealing and replacing Obamacare does very little to address the fundamental trajectory of the growth of federal involvement in our health care system. To do that, you have to tackle the two big Great Society entitlements: Medicare and Medicaid.

Unfortunately, the Senate is barred from using the reconciliation process to change Medicare. And even if it wasn’t, President Trump has made clear his opposition to Medicare reform. But the Senate bill does historic work to rein in the Medicaid program, putting it on a fiscally sustainable path and reducing its future spending by trillions of dollars.

Most of us think that slashing Medicaid is a bad thing that will devastate the poor, but to Roy it’s the main reason to support the Republican bill.

In fairness, Roy has been sounding the alarm about Medicaid and Medicare pretty much forever, so this is nothing new. But there’s still an odd thing here. The reason to favor Medicaid cuts in the first place is to improve the country’s finances, which the Republican bill doesn’t do. It just hands the money over to the rich. But Roy is enthusiastic anyway. Conversely, he never seemed all that thrilled with Obamacare’s cuts to Medicare, even though they were actually done right: they reined in spending growth by cutting payment levels to doctors and hospitals rather than reducing benefits or tossing people out of the program. The result was a significant boost to the solvency of the Medicare trust fund according to both the CBO and the Medicare trustees.

In any case, even if the rest of the bill is disappointing, kicking 15 million people off Medicaid and saving $772 billion apparently makes the whole thing worth it. Hooray.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend