Another Look at Police Shootings of Unarmed Civilians

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


I got some flak yesterday for posting a chart showing the number of police shootings of unarmed blacks and whites without taking into account crime rates. It’s harder to do that than you’d think, since the Department of Justice no longer produces crime statistics by race, but we can get a rough idea.

First, we’ll use the National Crime Victimization Survey. This is a telephone survey and isn’t based on arrest rates, so it doesn’t have problems of possible police bias in who they decide to arrest. Second, we’ll use the 2008 numbers for violent crimes (Tables 40 and 46 here), since that’s the last year we have data by race. Obviously this isn’t ideal, but I don’t imagine that violent crime rates by race have changed dramatically since then. We’ll compare this to the number of police shootings collected by the Washington Post for 2015.

The result is on the right. Don’t take it too seriously, but it probably provides a decent rough idea of the disparity in police shootings of unarmed civilians when you account for crime rates. Unarmed whites are shot about 15 times per million violent offenses. Unarmed blacks are shot about 28 times per million violent offenses.

POSTSCRIPT: Needless to say, I’m under no illusion that this will stop the flak. I’m sure plenty of people on both sides of the debate have plenty of adjustments they want to make to the raw data in order to make their own side look better.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest