High Income Inequality Makes Recessions a Little Worse

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

A new paper investigates the association between income inequality and recessions over the past 40 years:

It would appear that a less equal income distribution leads to deeper and more costly recessions. Overall, the length of the duration of contraction when going into a recession is longer and its amplitude deeper for countries with a less equal distribution of income.

But by how much? The authors use the World Bank’s GINI score and conclude that a one point increase in GINI leads to a 0.26 percent increase in the depth of a recession and a 0.2 percent increase in cumulative losses over the course of a recession. In other words, the effect is noticeable but not huge.

To make this a little more concrete, here’s a chart that shows how the authors would expect recessions in various countries to compare to a recession in Denmark, which has a very low GINI score. For the United States, other things equal, we should expect that our recessions would be about 3 percent deeper and produce 2 percent more losses than a recession in Denmark.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend