Software Patents Finally on the Supreme Court Docket For First Time in 33 Years

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

One of the reasons that software patents have run rampant over the past couple of decades is because the Federal Circuit Appeals Court—which handles all patent cases—has been effectively ignoring Supreme Court precedent. Over the past few years the Supreme Court has pushed back on this, but only around the edges in cases with fairly specialized applications. Next month, however, for the first time in 33 years, they’ll finally hear a case that explicitly gives them an opportunity to rein in the Federal Circuit and restate existing precedent that puts substantial restrictions on the ability to patent a software process.

Will they do it? Or will they shy away because it would strip billions of dollars in assets from software companies with huge patent portfolios? Tim Lee examines the possibilities here.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend