Microsoft’s New Tablet Sounds Great. So Why the Hate?

Will Oremus is outraged that Microsoft’s new, faster Surface tablets can actually be used for work-related activities:

The Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 are jam-packed with productivity features guaranteed to make you feel guilty for using the devices for anything other than work….faster processor, faster bus, better battery life, more cores on the GPU….full Microsoft Office suite, including Outlook….tweaking the kickstand to make it easier to type away at that Excel spreadsheet while holding the tablet on your lap.

….There’s just one problem with Microsoft pitching its new tablets at people who prefer to use their tablets for work rather than play: Those people barely exist. As the Statista chart below illustrates, a Gartner survey found that tablet owners use their devices overwhelmingly for entertainment, followed by social media, e-mail, and other types of communication. Just 15 percent of tablet screen time is devoted to work. That makes sense when you consider that nearly everyone who owns a tablet also owns a different device that is far-better suited to doing work, whether desktop, laptop, or both. The tablet is where they go to get away from that work.

Let me get this straight. The fact that Microsoft’s new tablets are faster, have better battery life, and come with Office apps pre-installed is somehow a bad thing? Wouldn’t this be a good thing if any other tablet maker in the world did it? WTF?

As for tablets not being used for work, I don’t doubt that. And you know why? Because most current tablets are useless for anything other than entertainment. Take something as simple as writing a post for my blog. I can’t do it all on an iPad. Period. And I had to try five different browsers before I could find one that worked on my Android tab. And that’s just for a blog post.

Don’t get me wrong. I haven’t seen the new Surface Pro tablet—the only one that’s interesting—and it’s possible that it sucks. Maybe it’s underpowered, or overpriced, or weighs too much, or just plain doesn’t work very well. I don’t know. But you know what? I’d love to have a tablet that allowed me to work without hassle and provided me all the entertainment options I currently have. The fact that I have access to a real browser and Office apps doesn’t stop me from playing Angry Birds or reading a book on my Kindle app, after all. It just means that I can now leave home with a simple, lightweight tablet and know that I can do whatever I need to do. If that’s work, then I’ll work. If it’s not, then I’ll play.

So why the hate?


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend