Chart of the Day: We Might Be Starting Up a New Housing Bubble

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

My favorite indicator of out-of-whack housing prices has always been the price-to-rent ratio. The rationale behind keeping an eye on it is pretty simple: rent is basically the return you get from investing in a home, so if the price of buying a home goes way up but the rent doesn’t, it means the return on investment from housing is declining. However, the only reason to make an investment with a low return is because you’re betting that the value of the home itself will keep rising, and at some point that simply makes no sense. Why should the value of a home keep rising if it remains a low return investment? Basically, you’re betting on a bubble.

The chart below, from Calculated Risk, shows the price-to-rent ratio (indexed to 1998 = 1.0) for the past few decades. Obviously things got way out of control from 2002 through 2006, and by 2012 it looked as though average house prices had retreated to reasonable levels. However, for the past 18 months the price-to-rent ratio has been rising fairly sharply. It’s too early to say that we’re in any kind of danger zone yet, but it’s worth staying vigilant. Given the weakness of the recovery and the weakness of income growth, it’s hard to think of too many good reasons that home values should be outpacing rents by very much.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend