Obamacare Has Its Problems, But It’s Basically On Track

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Peter Suderman reacts to Sen. Max Baucus’s latest complaint about the implementation of Obamacare:

If there’s any one legislator who can legitimately claim to be the law’s author, it’s Baucus. So it’s worth paying attention when Baucus says that he thinks the process of setting up the law’s health insurance exchanges is marching towards catastrophe.

There’s no question that Obamacare faces difficulties. It’s an imperfect law with a lot of moving parts, and it’s also facing tremendous resistance from Republicans around the country, who are doing everything they can to delay, defund, and just generally sabotage it. Put those two things together and smooth sailing was never in the cards.

But “catastrophe” is stretching things a bit. Baucus is, and has been, concerned about the implementation of Obamacare for some time. Yesterday, at a Senate hearing, he confronted HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius with his concerns, but this is really nothing new. Oversight is his job, and Baucus is worried that people don’t yet understand the law well and are going to be confused once the exchanges open up:

Ms. Sebelius replied that the department takes its outreach and education efforts “very, very seriously” and was currently recruiting consumer “navigators” to help with enrollment, but that it is hamstrung in part because it did not get additional resources for those efforts in the 2013 continuing resolution to fund the government.

“Having said that, we have engaged in efforts with the Small Business Administration, which is doing regular meetings around the country with our regional personnel, and we just released a request for proposals for on-the-ground navigators, individuals who come out of the faith community, the business community, the patient community, the hospital community who will be available to answer questions,” she said. “We also understand that people have a lot of questions and are deploying as many resources as we can to answer those questions and get folks ready to engage in open enrollment on Oct. 1.”

….Ms. Sebelius replied several times that officials were “definitely on track to implement the law as it is anticipated and have open enrollment start in every state in the country on Oct. 1st.”

I don’t expect the implementation of Obamacare to go smoothly. It’s big, it’s complex, it’s underfunded, and Republicans desperately want it to fail. This makes problems inevitable. Nevertheless, pouncing on every reported hitch as a harbinger of doom is taking schadenfreude too far. HHS has consistently claimed that they’ll be ready to go by October 1. Maybe that’s overoptimistic. But although it will probably take several years for Obamacare’s uptake rate to reach its goal, I’ll bet that by this time next year it will be up and running and basically doing its job. It’s a little early to be writing its obituary.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest