There’s More to the Economy Than Walmart

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Early last month, the blogging world was transfixed by a leaked set of emails from a Walmart executive complaining that the first week of sales in February was terrible. “February MTD sales are a total disaster,” said Jerry Murray, Walmart’s vice president of finance and logistics. “The worst start to a month I have seen in my ~7 years with the company.”

I didn’t bother reporting this when I first heard it, and I didn’t bother a second time when it started making the rounds of the blogosphere. It was one week of sales! Turns out this was a good call:

Retail and food-service sales increased 1.1% to a seasonally adjusted $421.4 billion, the Commerce Department said Wednesday, marking the fourth straight monthly gain and biggest rise since September. The figure was up 4.6% from a year ago….Retail sales excluding gasoline, automobiles and building materials—a figure watched closely by economists who use it as a truer gauge of consumer behavior—was up 0.36% in February, the Commerce Department said.

The number for general merchandise stores like Walmart wasn’t great, but it wasn’t disastrous either. Overall, consumer spending was fairly strong last month, it just wasn’t being directed Walmart’s way.

The lesson is simple. It’s silly to get too exercised about a single month’s economic data. It’s really silly to get too exercised about a single week’s economic data. And it’s silly beyond belief to get too exercised about a single week’s economic data at a single store, even if it is Walmart. Live and learn.

BY THE WAY: The company refers to itself these days as Walmart, not Wal-Mart. Copy desks everywhere take note.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend