Three Countries Take a Tiny First Step Toward More Sensible Drug Laws

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Why are U.S. drug laws so draconian? Partly it’s because Congress wants it that way, but partly it’s because the United States is a signatory to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which pretty much requires us to keep the production and distribution of psychoactive drugs prohibited. Because of this, there’s not much chance of significantly changing our drug laws unless we also change the Single Convention. That’s why Mark Kleiman thinks a recent joint declaration of Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico could be “significant news.” Here are some key excerpts:

We declare:

….2. That despite the efforts of the international community over decades, the use of [illicit drugs] continues to increase globally, generating substantial income for criminal organizations worldwide.

….6. It is urgent to review the approach so far maintained by the international community on drugs, in order to stop the flow of money from the illicit drug market.

….10. That the United Nations should exercise its leadership, as is its mandate, in this effort and conduct deep reflection to analyze all available options, including regulatory or market measures, in order to establish a new paradigm that prevents the flow of resources to organized crime organizations.

Click the link to read the whole thing. The language is obviously cautious, but it seems clear that these three countries, which have suffered more than most from drug-related violence, would like to rethink the Single Convention in order to make the drug trade less lucrative. This might or might not go anywhere, but it’s certainly worth some attention from anyone who wants to see drug laws rationalized. Renegotiating the Single Convention won’t happen anytime soon, but it’s a necessary first step.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest