The Offhand Taste of Even a Genius Is Still Offhand Taste

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Ryan Cooper points out that in the world of paid blogging, you don’t get to write posts only when the mood hits you. You have to write every single day, no matter what’s going on and what your mood is:

The expectation is that during the day you will write 10-12 posts. This includes an intro music video, a lunch links post, and evening links and/or video. So that means 7-9 short, punchy essays on something, with maybe 1-2 of those being longer and more worked out thoughts.

….If I had my dream job, I’d like to post 4-6 times during the day, and write longer pieces during the extra time. More importantly, I don’t want to get into the situation where the demand for content pushes me so hard that I stop taking new stuff in. (I think I could get the hang of full-time blogging, say, but no more than that.) And Andrew Sullivan’s habit of regular long breaks, disconnected from the machines, seems very smart, even necessary. I don’t think I could keep up with the likes of Matt Yglesias or Joe Weisenthal, and trying looks like a recipe for burnout.

I’ve long thought that although putting up a dozen posts a day may be good for your traffic numbers, it’s a mistake to do it even if you have the talent to pull it off. It reminds me of one of my favorite passages from The Power Broker, about what happened to Robert Moses when he simply got too busy to pay attention to his building projects the way he had early in his career. Those early projects had been works of genius because Moses, for all his faults, was a genius. But later in the book, author Robert Caro passes along an anecdote from Richard Spencer Childs, who was in the room when architect Aymar Embury interrupted to present Moses with a stack of drawings for some new parks. Moses zipped though them, making split-second decisions about which ones to keep and which ones to discard:

“There were no hard feelings. Moses and Embury were good friend,” [Childs said.]….”But here perhaps $100,000 worth of public business was settled on Moses’ offhand taste.” And, recalls Childs, when Moses finished with the drawings, Embury pointed to one he had rejected and said, “That one you threw away was the best of the lot.”

Embury may well have been correct: the offhand taste even of a genius is offhand taste.

Even if you have the talent, it’s hard to consistently produce good work, let alone memorable work, if you don’t have time to think. And these days, I suspect that an awful lot of writers no longer really have time to think.

In any case, I have good news for Ryan: his dream job exists! The bad news is that I already have it. I try to write about half a dozen posts a day, not ten or a dozen, and I doubt very much that anyone misses the four or five posts that therefore never get written. And the extra time (mostly taken during the afternoon, West Coast time) allows me to spend a few hours reading stuff I might not otherwise have time for, and to escape the tyranny of my RSS feed for a bit and think a little more about what everyone else is saying. Or even to change my mind about something I’ve written myself. It also gives me time to write three or four longer-form pieces each year for the magazine.

If I had the sheer energy and stamina to write more posts each day, maybe I’d do it. There’s no telling if I’d have the self-discipline to deliberately pace myself. But I don’t, and in the end I think I’m better off for it — and my readers too.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend