Raw Data: NAEP Reading Scores in Grades 4 and 8

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

The 2011 NAEP reading and math scores were released today for 4th and 8th graders, and unsurprisingly, they aren’t very different from the 2009 scores. It’s only been two years, after all. Here’s the basic 20-year trend:

Since 1992, average scores have gone up four points in 4th grade and five points in 8th grade. Using the usual rule of thumb, that’s an improvement of about half a grade level. Black and Hispanic students have done a bit better, improving their scores by roughly a full grade level since 1992. Here’s a breakdown by reading proficiency levels:

This is not spectacular progress, but it’s progress. Since 1992, the number of students testing “Below Basic” is down significantly in both grade levels for all ethnic groups, and the number of students testing “Proficient” or above is up a fair amount.

Test scores for 11th graders are usually not as encouraging: most of the gains in 4th and 8th grade seem to wash out in high school. But we’ll have to wait a bit to see those scores. For the time being, it appears that we’re continuing to make steady but slow progress. Whether that’s good enough is a different question, and not one that the NAEP can answer. This is just a bit of raw data for your consideration.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest