The End of Netflix

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


I got a personal email from Netflix CEO Reed Hastings this morning:

Dear Kevin,

I messed up. I owe you an explanation.

It is clear from the feedback over the past two months that many members felt we lacked respect and humility in the way we announced the separation of DVD and streaming and the price changes. That was certainly not our intent, and I offer my sincere apology. Let me explain what we are doing.

Well, OK, this wasn’t really an email sent just to me. It was sent to me and several million other pissed off Netflix customers. Still, it’s nice that Hastings knows we’re pissed-off and wants to explain things. So here’s the explanation:

It’s hard to write this after over 10 years of mailing DVDs with pride, but we think it is necessary: In a few weeks, we will rename our DVD by mail service to “Qwikster”. We chose the name Qwikster because it refers to quick delivery. We will keep the name “Netflix” for streaming.

Huh? Unlike many internet denizens, I wasn’t especially cheesed off when I read this. I was just — bemused. Why should I care if they’re changing the name of their DVD service? Why should anyone care? And in what way is this an explanation for a big price increase? This is like breaking your neighbor’s window and then “explaining” that tomorrow you’re planning to take a trip to the zoo. The two things just don’t have anything to do with each other.

Meh. Hastings should have saved his virtual postage. More here, if you’re interested. My take is that this is the beginning of the end for the DVD service, no matter what Hastings says. He doesn’t want the Netflix brand ruined by the plummeting customer satisfaction that’s going to follow the almost certain service and selection downgrades on Qwikster once the smoke has cleared. Oh well. Nothing lasts forever. But with Blockbuster gone, Redbox mostly limited to newer releases, and streaming services offering only a tiny selection, where am I going to go if I want to watch some movie made more than a decade ago? I guess I’ll just wait for them to show up on cable until the content providers figure out what to do.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest