Turning the Tables on the Debt Ceiling

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, has made it clear that he considers hostage taking over the debt ceiling to be the new normal. From now on, Republicans are going to use the threat of default as a routine legislative maneuver. Michael Shear thinks Democrats should reciprocate and do the same when a Republican is president, but Jon Chait isn’t sure this will work:

As a practical matter, I doubt this. In order to hold the debt ceiling hostage, you need, at the very least, extremely high levels of party discipline (in the House and the Senate, lest the upper chamber openly break ranks and isolate your hostage-taking wing.) You also probably need a propaganda apparatus that can create its own empirical reality in which the experts who warn that failing to lift the debt ceiling would create dire consequences are all wrong. I don’t think the Democratic Party has either of these.

I’d add one more thing to this: what, exactly, would Democrats be holding out for if they did this? Republicans have an ideal topic: in return for raising the debt ceiling, we need to work on reducing the national debt. To a lot of voters, regardless of whether they approve, this at least makes sense. It seems natural, not artificial.

But what would Democrats do? Hold up the debt ceiling unless Republicans agree to bring the troops home from Yemen (or wherever our troops are a few years from now)? Hold up the debt ceiling unless Republicans agree to pass an immigration bill? Hold up the debt ceiling unless Republicans agree to reduce carbon emissions? None of these things seem even remotely tied to the idea of debt, which makes them far more obviously artificial than what Republicans did. And that means less public support and less media support.

That’s a drag, but it’s reality. Partisan tactics don’t always work in mirror image form. We need to have our own outrageous tactics, not necessarily the same outrageous tactics as Republicans.

(Though Jon does offer an interesting twist: next time, maybe Dems should hold up the debt ceiling until Republicans agree to abolish the debt ceiling entirely. I don’t know if that would work either, but it’s an idea.)

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest