Itemizing Obama’s Savings

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


So how much does President Obama’s deficit reduction plan save? For some reason he’s chosen a 12-year timeframe, and here’s how things add up:

  • Domestic discretionary: $770 billion
  • Defense: $400 billion
  • Healthcare: $480 billion
  • Mandatory spending: $360 billion
  • Tax expenditures: $300 billion?
  • Bush tax cuts for the wealthy: $820 billion. (Note: this is based on estimated savings of $690 billion over 10 years.)
  • Lower interest costs: $1 trillion

Obama claims this adds up to “three dollars of spending cuts and interest savings for every one dollar from tax reform,” but that’s an odd way of looking at things. Who cares where the interest savings come from? (And that $1 trillion number looks dodgy anyway.) This is basically a 2:1 ratio of spending cuts to tax increases.

Which is unfortunate. It might be politically wise, but it probably ought to be more like 2:1 in the other direction. Eventually it will be once everyone wakes up and realizes we don’t have any other choices left, but it’s going to take a while and Obama apparently isn’t going to be the guy to push us in that direction.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest