Obamacare vs. PPACA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Jon Cohn defends the term “Obamacare”:

I get what the polls are saying. This is still not a particularly popular piece of legislation. People may not want to repeal it, but they’re not about to celebrate it, either. I imagine the White House and the Democrats have strategists who have run surveys on this and concluded the term is not particularly helpful.

Even so, I like the term. I think this bill will be popular someday and, in the meantime, I think it’s a reminder that this administration did something that will help millions of Americans while starting to put our health care system in order. Maybe I’m wrong — I’ve certainly been wrong about this before — but I think that within a few years, and maybe even by 2012, association with the health care plan will be a net plus.

I’d say that 2012 is pretty optimistic, but I certainly agree that eventually Obamacare will be a popular program. My question is whether this is ever likely to catch on. Social Security isn’t RooseveltSecurity and Medicare isn’t JohnsonCare. Presidents really don’t get their names associated like this very often except with broad world views like Bush Doctrine, Reaganomics, etc. And even that’s not very common.

The real problem here is that Democrats, once again, failed Legislation 101. This was their bill. They could name it anything they wanted. So what did they choose? PPACA. That’s very memorable, isn’t it? What’s wrong with these guys?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest