Net Neutrality Deal Getting Closer

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Apparently a deal on net neutrality is close to completion:

Although the exact details of the plan have yet to be unveiled, analysts agreed that the FCC had made two big concessions to the US cable industry in its plan….Cable groups staunchly opposed a plan unveiled by Mr Genachowski earlier this year that could have led to price controls by the FCC — and that proposal now appears to be dead.

….The FCC has also, in effect, given a thumbs up to tiering practices that are already in place that allow companies to charge consumers based on internet usage. “The exception to that is if, for example, a cable company charges Netflix more to carry traffic because it is video content. That would not be permissable. But they could certainly charge by volume or by the speed that they are carrying traffic,” said Rebecca Arbogast, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus.

I don’t have a firm position on the issue of regulating cable companies as telecommunications services, which would have given the FTC authority over pricing, but I think it’s probably secondary to getting some strong net neutrality rules put in place. What’s more, if real net neutrality is in the works — and we won’t know for sure until we see the details — I also don’t have any problem with allowing internet providers to institute usage-based charges. That’s a market decision, and as long as the charges are strictly bit-based and not content or provider based, that’s fine. I have no problem with the idea that if you want more of something, you have to pay for it.

In any case, this tentatively seems like good news. Stay tuned for the details.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest