The White House Takes on Forbes

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The White House gets it. Here’s their reaction to the Dinesh D’Souza/Newt Gingrich contention that Barack Obama is motivated by neocolonial hatred of white people and the West:

“It’s a stunning thing, to see a publication you would see in a dentist’s office, so lacking in truth and fact,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs says in an interview. “I think it represents a new low.”

Gibbs is meeting with Thursday afternoon with Forbes’s Washington bureau chief, Brian Wingfield, to discuss his objections. “Did they not fact-check this at all, or did they fact-check it and just willfully ignore it?” he asks.

The magazine would not make Editor-in-Chief Steve Forbes, who ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 1996 and 2000, available for comment, or any other editor.

D’Souza is a longtime firebrand who gets his kicks saying outlandish things. Gingrich will do anything for attention. If that’s all there was to this, it would hardly be worth responding to.

Except that this all appeared in Forbes, a mainstream magazine that, as Gibbs put it, “you would see in a dentist’s office.” That’s something new.

Meanwhile, aside from designated reasonable guy Ramesh Ponnuru, I note that The Corner has been in complete radio silence over the Forbes piece for five straight days even though they were the ones who broke the Gingrich reaction story in the first place. That finally changed a couple of hours ago when Andy McCarthy declared that although he hadn’t read the story, “I’m anxious to get to it” — because, unsurprisingly, he’s pretty sure it’s spot on. No one is ever obligated to blog about anything they don’t want to, of course, but you’d think that when one of their own unearths a big ol’ chattering class blockbuster like this it would prompt a little more chatter than that.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend