The Paradox of Healthcare Reform

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

I won’t pretend that I really know what this means, but here are the results from yesterday’s New York Times poll related to healthcare reform. Follow the bouncing arrow:

So: 49% of Americans disapprove of healthcare reform. That’s not good. But wait! Only 40% actually want it repealed. The rest figure it should be given a chance even if they don’t like it much. That’s better. And if you tell them that repeal would also mean repealing the preexisting condition provision, only 19% want it repealed. That’s better still.

Now, none of this changes the broad political fact that “healthcare reform” as a standalone campaign pitch seems to be a loser. That’s not what I expected this far after the bill was signed, but other polls confirm it. However, it’s also the case that what the bill actually does seems to remain pretty popular. This poll only asks about one particular provision, but previous polls have gotten similar results for most (though not all) of the bill’s other provisions.

Now there are two ways you can work with this result. The first is the complicated way: you explain that the bill bans companies from dropping customers with preexisting conditions (hooray!), but if you do that then you also have to insist that healthy people all get insurance too. Otherwise insurance companies will go out of business due to cherry picking. And if you do that, then you have to subsidize working class families that can’t afford insurance and expand Medicaid for poor families who can’t even afford subsidized private care. And once you’ve done that, that’s 90% of healthcare reform right there.

This is all true, but your audience’s eyes will glaze over about five seconds after the word “preexisting.” Still, there’s also an easy way to do this: just stop. Don’t explain the whole bill, just campaign on the preexisting condition clause. And also the tax credits, the end of the doughnut hole, the end of copayments for preventive care, the end of lifetime limits, the subsidies, and the Medicaid expansion. Oddly, though, that seems to be harder than it appears. Tim Kaine tried this tack on Jon Stewart the other night, and Stewart practically sneered him off the stage for it. It’s true that Kaine didn’t do a very good job, but still. Stewart is a pretty sympathetic audience.

So….it’s a mystery. People generally like the provisions of the law, but they yawn (or worse) when you tell them about all those provisions. I’m not sure what to make of this aside from concluding that people are just in a bad mood and it doesn’t matter what you say to them.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest