The Problem With Superheroes

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

After musing on the question of what Iron Man 2 would be like if it were just the story of an ordinary person without any kind of superpowers, Ross Douthat muses on the question of what superhero movies have done to the cinema recently:

Sometimes I try to imagine what the 1970s would have been like if comic-book movies had dominated the cinematic landscape the way they do today. Francis Ford Coppola would have presumably gravitated toward the operatic darkness of the Batman franchise, casting first Al Pacino and then Robert De Niro as Italian-American Bruce Waynes. Martin Scorsese would have become famous for his gritty, angry take on the Incredible Hulk, with Harvey Keitel stepping into Bruce Banner’s shoes and Diane Keaton as his love interest….[Etc.]….If this revision of the ’70s sounds like a cinematic paradise, you probably liked “The Dark Knight” a whole lot more than I did.

This strikes me as backwards. After all, Godfather the book was just a garden variety genre bestseller — basically the beach reading equivalent of a good quality comic book. It wouldn’t show up on any literary critic’s list of the best 20th century novels. But Godfather the picture shows up on practically every film critic’s list of the best 20th century movies, so genre obviously wasn’t a problem here. Likewise, the problem with superhero movies probably isn’t the genre, it’s what today’s directors do with them. In the same way that Coppola transcended the usual boundaries of mob flicks and John Ford did the same for westerns, maybe they would have made great comic book adaptations too if they’d given it a whirl. And if they hadn’t? Well, it’s not as if both of them didn’t make plenty of clunkers too. Maybe Coppola’s Batman would have replaced Coppola’s Tucker, not his Godfather.

Or not. Who knows? But instead of wondering what Iron Man would be like without the superpowers, wouldn’t a better question be: if the story was any good to start with, why should superpowers ruin it? Maybe it’s inherent in the genre, but I sort of doubt it.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest