Income Tax Greatest Hits

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Via Jonah Goldberg, AEI’s Mark Perry reaches deep into his bag of greatest hits and hauls out the chart on the right:

As the chart below shows (data here), the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 40.42 percent of all income taxes collected in 2007 ($451 billion), the highest share in modern history for that group….One could even argue that the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 were actually huge “tax cuts for the poor and middle class” because they helped to increase the number of “non-payers” by more than 14 million Americans between 2000 and 2007. Secondly, the tax burden on “the rich” — the top 1 percent of taxpayers — reached a record high in 2007 of more than 40 percent, and was higher after the Bush tax cuts than before.

It’s true that the share of income tax paid by the rich went up between 1980 and today.  But that’s because the share of income earned by the rich went up during that period.  In fact, it more than doubled.  And since income taxes are a percentage of income, you’d pretty much expect that if your share of income more than doubled, then your share of income tax would also more than double.

But for the top 1% it didn’t.  It just doubled.  In other words, it went up a little bit more slowly than their actual increase in income.  Why?  Because tax rates on the rich have decreased steadily under Republican presidents since 1980.

Griping about taxes is every American’s birthright.  But if your share of the income pie increases by 135% over thirty years while everyone else stagnates, you’re a pretty lucky ducky.  Surely the least you can do is not complain that your share of the tax bill went up by only 100%?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest