Unsurprising News Watch – Sarah Palin Edition

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Maybe I spoke too soon.  Mark Halperin also scores this morning with some pretty unsurprising news.  Here’s what he says we’ll find in Sarah Palin’s new book:

* some score settling with McCain aides she believes ill-served her (names will be named).

* a hearty bashing of the national media.

* an account of how her upbringing shaped her maverick sensibilities.

* a testimonial to the importance of faith in her life.

* a warm and personal tone, written in Palin’s own voice, despite the involvement of a collaborator.

Two things not in the book:

* Don’t look for hefty policy prescriptions.

* Once source who has seen  “Going Rogue” says it does not include an index.  That would give Palin a subtle revenge on the party’s Washington establishment, whose members tend to flip to the back pages and scan for their own names. If they want to know what Sarah Palin has to say about them, they will have to buy the book — and read the whole thing.

Yep, that’s a real shocker.  Score settling!  Media bashing!  Maverickiness!  Faith!  Light on policy!

Jesus.  As for the index thing, I hope someone is just pulling Halperin’s leg.  It’s true that Beltway types like to look in book indexes for their names, but not including one won’t slow down that game by more than a few minutes.  Hell, if it doesn’t have its own index, some obsessive nerd will scan and OCR the whole thing and create a web index before it’s even hit the shelves.  Still, it does reek of that trademark Palin combination of spitefulness and teenage tribalism, doesn’t it?  Plus a gratuitous dose of anti-intellectualism, since only scholar type folks use indexes.  So maybe it’s true.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend