Quote of the Day

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


From Alan Greenspan, on the size of U.S. banks:

If they’re too big to fail, they’re too big.

Interesting.  On the one hand, Greenspan is really on the side of the angels here.  “I don’t think merely raising the fees or capital on large institutions or taxing them is enough,” he says.  If they’re too big, we need to just chop ’em down to size.  On the other hand, he’s also using this as an opportunity to slag his successors for creating the moral hazard of too-big-to-fail in the first place: “When push came to shove, they didn’t stand up,” he says of the decision last year to rescue Fannie, Freddie, and AIG.  But it’s pretty hard to believe that if Greenspan had still been Fed chair at the time, he would have risked allowing the financial system to melt down.  And the “Greenspan put” predates the “Bernanke put” by many years.

Still and all, it’s interesting that Greenspan, of all people, is willing to endorse an idea that’s apparently too radical for current officeholders to even think about.  It’s sort of like all those out-of-office Republicans who say they’re in favor of healthcare reform now.  I guess it’s a lot easier to buck the tide when you’re not the one holding the bag.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest