Your Tax Dollars at Work

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Here’s something a little different to take advantage of our brief respite between Friday the 13th and the Ides of March.  Yesterday Marian and I had lunch at Ruby’s, and as usual our utensils came wrapped in a napkin that was held in place by a paper napkin ring.  I have helpfully recreated this setup in the picture on the right.

Seems ordinary enough, doesn’t it?  But as I unwrapped the silverware I noticed something: a patent notice.  This little paper napkin ring, it turned out, was protected by U.S. Patent No. 6,644,498.  I was intrigued.  What was patentable about this thing?  The stickum?  It seemed like ordinary Post-It Note type stuff.  The size and shape?  Couldn’t be.  The logo?  No.

Luckily, the web knows all.  When I got home I pulled up the patent to see what it was for.  The answer is below the fold.Did you guess?  The patent is not for anything to do with the napkin ring itself but for the packaging method: they’re sold on a roll instead of in a box.  This is apparently a boon to wait staff and busboys everywhere:

Currently […] Individual paper napkin rings are typically supplied pre-cut into their individual size and stacked one on top of another into a brick of product.

When the ring is to be installed on a napkin surrounding a set of silverware, the napkin ring must be peeled from the stack and formed in its ring shape around the silverware and napkin. Thus, a server must use both hands to peel the paper napkin ring from the stack.

Therefore, a need exists for a new type of napkin ring configuration such that the napkin rings can be sequentially removed from a continuous strip to eliminate the difficulty in removing a napkin ring from the supply stack.

Fascinating, no?  Putting things on a roll has been used for decades in such high-tech applications as, oh, postage stamps and carnival tickets, but apparently if you apply this to paper napkin rings it’s patentable.  We live in marvelous times, don’t we?


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend