How Dr. Oz Got It Wrong on Organics

Mehmet Oz: Be democratic, forget organic. <a href="">David Berkowitz</a>/Wikimedia Commons

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

“There’s nothing like a block of frozen spinach to make you feel bad about your family dinner,” observes heart surgeon, TV personality, and health pundit Dr. Mehmet Oz in the latest Time. The advice in Oz’s piece is mostly on point—foodie trends shouldn’t keep people from eating unglamorous, wholesome foods like frozen veggies or canned beans, especially if that’s all they can afford.

But I think the good doctor misdiagnoses the case when he paints organic food as a frivolous luxury:

Organic food is great, it’s just not very democratic. As a food lover, I enjoy truffle oil, European cheeses and heirloom tomatoes as much as the next person. But as a doctor, I know that patients don’t always have the time, energy or budget to shop for artisanal ingredients and whip them into a meal.

I agree there’s no point in worrying about whether everyone has access to fancy oil or Camembert. But organic food is different. For one thing, pesticides are poisonous, and they poison the people who have to deal with them: farmworkers. I can think of few less-snobby reasons for buying organic than that it protects the people who feed us from toxic exposure.

But the people who tend sprayed crops aren’t the only ones at risk from pesticides. So are the very people in Oz’s audience: eaters. Using US Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency data, the Environmental Working Group has established (latest “Dirty Dozen” study here) that conventionally grown produce often contains a range of low-level pesticide residues. Some samples of conventional grapes had as many as 15 distinct pesticide traces, EWG found. And in a Stanford study released this year, researchers found that organic produce carried substantially less of these chemicals than conventional—and as I demonstrated in a post on the study, the researchers actually understate the risk reduction offered by organic produce in their conclusion.

Moreover, a growing weight of research suggests that regular exposure to even tiny levels of pesticides carries significant health risk—especially for children and the offspring of pregnant women.

Consider the following data points—all from papers published in the past few months.

  • In an October paper in Environmental Health Perspectives, University of California-Irvine researchers found that the fungicide triflumizole is a likely obesogen—that is, it seems to boost fat-cell production at very low levels. The researchers applied traces of triflumizole to both human stem cell cultures and to the drinking water of pregnant mice—and in both cases, triflumizole induced fat-cell production. For the mice, the fungicide acted as an obesogen at a dose that’s 400 times lower than the EPA’s “no observed adverse effect level.” Triflumizole is widely used on California fruit and vegetable fields, the study authors report. Crops include leafy greens, broccoli, cauliflower, apples, pears, cherries, and melons—i.e., the very things people should be eating more of.
Pregnant women who showed elevated organophosphate levels in their urine experienced shorter pregnancies and had babies with lower birth weights than women with lower levels.
  • For a paper released in November, UK researchers conducted a “meta-analysis” on the neurological effects of organophosphate pesticides at low levels—that is, they gathered all of the well-designed studies on the topic they could find and analyzed the combined results. They found a “significant association between low-level exposure to OPs [organophosphates] and impaired neurobehavioral function.” Specifically, they found that exposure to the pesticides reduced people’s memory and their ability to process information quickly. Organophosphates have been “largely withdrawn from use” in the last decade, EWG reports, but the Environmental Protection Agency has not seen fit to ban them, and they are still sprayed on some crops. According to EWG’s latest analysis of USDA data, they still turn up in bell peppers, green beans, kale, and collards—again, all foods that authorities like Oz rightly encourage people to eat more of. EWG recommends buying these foods organic if possible.

EWG also points to an April 2012 study finding that 300 pregnant women who showed elevated organophosphate levels in their urine experienced shorter pregnancies and had babies with lower birth weights than women with lower levels. The pregnancies took place after organophosphate use had dropped,” EWG points out, and indicate that “organophosphate exposures must be further curtailed to protect children’s health.” In other words, they’re still out there—and getting into the food supply.

  • Yet another study—this one released in October by researchers from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center in New York—found that exposure to a pesticide class called dichlorophenols is linked to food allergies. The researchers looked at data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006, and found that nearly a quarter of the 10,348 survey participants had dichlorophenols in their urine. People with heightened levels of dichlorophenols in their urine were significantly more likely to have food allergies. Interestingly, dichlorophenols are used in the process of chlorinating tap water, the authors report. But that’s not how they think people are getting heightened exposure to them. Switching to bottled water from tap may make sense, but “pesticide-treated fruits and vegetables” “may play a greater role in causing food allergy,” Dr. Elina Jerschow, the study’s lead author, said in a press release.

I could go on like this for a while—see here and here—but by now, Oz will have gotten the idea. I know that he’s aware of the risks associated with low-level exposure to toxins, especially for children—Oz made quite a fuss over the problem of arsenic in that kids’ drink par excellence, apple juice.

And I agree with Oz that it’s hard to ask families to pay more for organic foods when budgets are already stretched tight. The EWG’s Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 lists can help consumers prioritize which produce items to try to buy organic and which to worry less about if funds are tight. (Spinach, incidentally, lands on the dirty list).

But what would really be great is if Oz would use his syndicated TV show and Time forum to push for stronger pesticide regulations and more federal support for organic farmers. When those policy goals are achieved, people can eat their frozen spinach without subjecting themselves and their kids to the established risks of pesticide exposure—and farmworkers can grow that spinach without putting themselves at even greater risk. Oz should think about them next time he paints organic as a mere indulgence of the well-to-do.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend