Puerto Rico Got Rid of Its Coal Ash Pits. Now the Company Responsible Is Moving Them to Florida.

“Now AES wants to dump their pollution in the very place that people fled to for safety.”

Natasha Breen/REDA&CO/UIG/Getty

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

This story was originally published by Grist and is shared here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. 

This past January, Itiba De Jesus moved to St. Cloud, in Osceola County, Florida, in search of affordable housing and land to expand her sustainable agriculture project. She has lived in Florida for 17 years but grew up in Puerto Rico. After Hurricane Maria wiped out crops across Puerto Rico, she co-founded a community garden to help groups on the island and nearby Orlando grow their own food. Then she got word that thousands of tons of ash containing toxic metals from Puerto Rico’s Guayama coal plant were headed for her new home.

Seeing the same source of contamination travel from one of the places she calls home to another “felt like a double whammy,” said De Jesus.

Osceola County in central Florida is home to the second fastest-growing Puerto Rican community in the country. Many of the transplants living there today were still finding their footing after the devastation of Hurricane Maria when the county broke the news earlier this year that it would be taking on thousands of tons of coal ash relocated from the U.S territory. The coal ash is a byproduct of a power plant operating in Guayama, Puerto Rico, which provides 17 percent of the island’s electricity.

For years, residents near the Guayama plant have called for the plant’s operator, the Virginia-based Fortune 500 Company AES Corporation, to clean up its act, as the heavy metal-laden ash can contaminate local soil and water. In Puerto Rico, the coal ash pits contributed to unsafe levels of boron, lithium, molybdenum, selenium, and sulfate in groundwater, according to a recent analysis by the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project.

Puerto Rico banned the dumping of coal ash in 2017, so AES needed to find somewhere else to send its waste. This spring, the JED landfill—located in a rural area of Osceola County—agreed to take that coal ash for $2 a ton. Around 44,000 tons have already been delivered and a total of 200,000 could arrive by the end of the year, according to a white paper distributed to the media by the County Commissioner of Osceola, Fred Hawkins.

Around 200,000 people came to the Sunshine State from Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria devastated the islands—many of them picking up their lives after moving to Central Florida, including the communities surrounding the landfill in question. “The people of Puerto Rico didn’t fight for years to get this toxic pollution removed from our communities just so AES could turn around and force their poison on Puerto Ricans in Florida,” said Adriana Gonzalez, environmental justice organizer for Sierra Club de Puerto Rico, in a statement. “Now AES wants to dump their pollution in the very place that people fled to for safety.”

The JED Landfill did not respond to Grist’s request for additional comment. But company officials told the Orlando Sentinel earlier this week that their facility is equipped to safely take on the coal ash. Unlike other landfills—like the unlined coal ash pits flooded by Hurricane Florence—the Osceola waste facility is equipped with multiple liners which AES and JED Landfill say will prevent any leakage into the groundwater.

“AES Puerto Rico is delivering its manufactured aggregate product to lined, state-of-the-art and environmentally-friendly landfills in the mainland U.S., in accordance with federal and state environmental regulations,” AES Corporation told Grist in an email.

The company said that the central Florida landfill is one of “multiple options” it is developing to manage coal ash coming from its Puerto Rico plant, and that it has previously disposed of its waste in landfills across other states. “Disposal of [coal ash] in landfills that meet stringent design, operation, and closure requirements is a common, everyday occurrence,” they said.

Earlier this year, Puerto Rico passed legislation establishing the goal of powering its grid with 100 percent renewable energy by 2050, which requires giving up coal power by 2028. In the meantime, the territory’s waste left behind from burning coal has to go somewhere. “These are not easy issues,” said Luis Martinez, a director for the Natural Resources Defense Council’s clean energy and climate program. (Prior to joining the NRDC, he worked with Puerto Rico’s environmental quality board to clean up contamination left behind by US military occupation.) “The best we can do is ensure that wherever our waste is being disposed, that it’s being properly managed so that it doesn’t escape and contaminate our water, air, and soil.”

Martinez and other advocates pointed to the importance of Puerto Rico transitioning to using more solar energy as part of the country’s renewable energy goals, producing fewer potentially harmful byproducts.

“Nobody wants [coal ash] in their backyard. That’s a very human reaction,” Martinez said.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend